Has anyone seen the movie "The Kingdom of Heaven"? Besides the thing that the movie is very well made, the character of Salahuddin acted very well in that movie. I liked the character so much that I got tempted to keep the name of this blog after it.

Tuesday, March 29, 2011

USA and the modern freedom

Some people might be of the opinion that I completely dislike the west and it's role in the world. However, I prove them wrong by this post.

Actually, USA is the country that symbolizes modern freedom. And, it has a lot to do in the coming years. There are two things that it did, which helped the beliefs/hopes of modern freedom throughout the world.

1. Winning against The British, and establishing the "first free country" of the world.
2. Dropping an atomic bomb on Japan.

Yes, that is right. Though I do not say it is good, dropping an atom bomb helped modern freedom. Today, all the countries in the world are enjoying an unprecedented modernity of co-existence and collaboration. Does this mean, everybody likes everyone else, no. Almost everyone in the world dislikes his/her neighboring countries. Many people dislike other persons of different caste/creed/color/race. But still, peace prevails between countries! (Read my other post on history, if you do not agree with this: http://salahuddin-knowledgehobbyist.blogspot.com/2010/04/i-watched-kingdom-of-heaven-recently.html)

How did it happen? Yes, it is due to the fear of the "ultimate weapon", the "atom bomb". The countries/races which warred for centuries, are afraid of the word "war", only because of this ultimate weapon. As a result, whole humanity is focusing on other frontiers, like science, research, global business collaboration etc... And that is how, majority of the people of the world are living without the fear of war, every day.

The 2000-5000 years of human civilization is a testimony to "casulaties of war". Many a times, no arts flourished in a region, only because there was no good king, no stability there. And, places which were full of arts and artists, are those where the empire is stable for decades/centuries. And people had to be good at war to survive the unstable period. It does not matter what arts/sciences you know, you just have to be able to weild the sword. There is a great mathematician called Galois, who died in a battle, and wrote the stuff of his life, the night before it, since he knew what would happen the next day, anyway. So sad, and a great casualty to the human civilization.

There are no such casualties now. In some sense, post 2nd world war, is the modern era, much much better than the period immediately before that. People of the world are more free today, due to the "atomic bomb". (I do not say it is good to drop an atomic bomb, neighter do I approve of that USA act.)

It is not the nature of war, to result in stale-mates. And it is not the nature of war, to fight 10000 people with 10000 people back. The actions and reactions of war, are always dis-proportionate, and they are meant to be so. This incidentally gives the lost side's rulers, a way to play with history, and the mind-sets and sentiments of their citizens. It also helps the winners, twist the history to somehow justify the brutal slaughter they did. However, it is in the nature of war, that's it.

However, it could have been much worse, had it been another country that discovered the atom bomb first. USA dropped it on Japan twice, and stopped. If one of these colonial nations discovered it, that would have been the apocalypse to the rest of the world. In the name of the queen, all of the world would be mopping the floors of the Br....sh parliament or something. Good that it was the USA, the first free country of the truly modern world.

And USA does not believe in colonizing, it is a country built on freedom, compassion and equal opportunity. Great that USA did not capitalize on that particular technology, and colonized the world. Instead, the mayhem was stopped with Japan's surrender, ushering the gates to "modern freedom". So much so that, today, even the USA is afraid of attacking another tiny country with the "ultimate weapon".

The east had/has a notion of freedom, that is not based on material freedom, opposite to the west. However, in the wake of industrialization, and mechanization, the importance of such a notion was reduced, quite frankly. These are the days when technology wins wars, who would worry about a devout/idealistic warrior or clan of warriors, who do not like your opportunism? The idealism of the east flourished arts like Karate etc..., and made our earlier civilizations prosper. All this lasted before indusrial revolution, and western colonization.

However, post colonization, the whole world was literally forced to become western. It was so forced that by the turn of 20th century, everyone knows and is aware of the rest of the world, in some sense. It was all needed because no man, could win against the machines of the west, it had to be learnt and defeated using it's own way. And, I do not fret in telling that out to others.

Indian independence struggle was also unique in this aspect that, Mr. Gandhi tried to retain the Indian notion of freedom, as a prevailing philosohy of the independence protests. His philosophy of "You can take my life but not my obedience", gave moral strength to countless indians fighting british, and many countries in the world followed the method too. In it, lies the notion of "oriental freedom", which he forced the westerners to fathom.

However, the world wars are "quests for global dominance", mostly by the colonizing countries, to finally find out who is the champion. This was the pinnacle of mechanization era, which lasted for 200 years, exploiting the colonies and amassing wealths enough the destroy the world 10 times over. However, the destruction was huge, but, the colonizing countries finally had to pay the price. A new bi-polar world where the poles are two totally new countries emerged from those.

And good that those countries were "modern" in the present sense of the word. They do not want colonies, they just fight for freedom. They helped convince the current colonizing countries to grant freedom to other countries. And idealism changes in those countries, also helped colonies get their freedom back. Thus emerged the "modern world".

In this era, the East's notions of freedom (from oneself, non-egoistic living etc...) are of lesser consequence than the Western notions, unfortunately. However, as a matter of evolution, we need to accept that, and go along, even if those look alien to us. And, actually great thanks to USA that gave the countries their way of understanding that, in some manner. Hope that through "global partnership of people, especially the Indians and Americans", as naturally happening now, a new and better notion of freedom, marrying these two would come into prevalence.

Truly USA and the east have a lot to do together, in the future.

No comments:

Post a Comment